|
WCD Forum |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3. Second Session: The WCD Decision-making Framework – towards implementation The participants were each assigned to one of four working groups, set up to work in parallel on the same topics, and to report back at the end of the morning. The groups were asked to hold an initial discussion on:
The groups reported back to plenary at the end of the morning, indicating a considerable area of common ground concerning priorities for the post-WCD period. Widespread support existed for:
Many felt that the importance of the above actions warranted the establishment of a light, time-limited follow-up unit to play a catalysing and co-ordinating role, to mobilise funding and to ensure appropriate support to specific activities. Others were reluctant to support anything that appeared like a perpetuation of the Commission under another guise. The four working groups also had a range of ideas on field-testing of the WCD recommendations, developing cases studies of their application, further work on issues such as options assessment, existing dams, or on compliance mechanisms. Positions remained divided on the structure, governance and administrative location of any organised follow-up unit.
Copyright © 1998-2001 The World Commission on Dams |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||