|
WCD Forum |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Second WCD Forum Meeting "Where we stand: The Industry Group Viewpoint" The WCD Industry Group is drawn from forum members in the private sector and financial contributors. ABB and Hydro Quebec initiated a workshop of the group prior to the Forum Meeting in Cape Town, April 2000. Participants: ABB, ABB Alstom, Atlas Copco, Coyne & Bellier, Enron, Harza, Hydro Quebec, Lahmeyer, Siemens, Skanska Agenda
WCD - Industry Group Position Dams
The future of dams is of great concern for industry but there must be a balance between development and conservation! The World Commission on Dams is very important: It is a full-scale test of the process of sustainable development
WCD can be a model for developing infrastructure projects - industry wants to learn Past experience with dams not always positive
Knowledge-base of all aspects of dams has developed over the last hundred years Lessons learned - industry is doing and will do a better job Role of the private sectorNearly all dams in the past were Government projects, in which the role of industry was restricted to building the scheme Since the 90s the role of the private sector is expanding. Dam projects of the future will often be funded and developed by the private sector. This creates new responsibilities. But private sector projects require: reasonable rate of return, short leadtime, predictibility of decision process Private sector - Shared responsibilities As developer of future dam projects, the private sector shares responsibility for technical, environmental, social and financial aspects The choice of future projects will increasingly be driven by the interaction of market forces, comprehensive options assessment, stakeholder participation and government policies Why can we build good projects now?
Benefits of large damsLeast-cost way to store large quantities of water (to make provisions for droughts or seasonal rainfall cycles) Proven option for electricity supply, water supply, and irrigation Provide flood control as a side-benefit to having a reservoir Potential for recreation, fisheries & environmental protection of surrounding watershed (to ensure water quality, erosion control) Reservoirs may be very productive ecosystems Benefits of hydropowerIt is the only renewable energy technology commercially available on a large scale (20% of world electricity supply) It produces negligible amounts of SO2, NOx and greenhouse gases
It easily adjusts the amount of electricity produced to the amount demanded by consumers (load following) and provides ancillary services It is the only renewable power generation technology that allows multi-purpose use of water resources Hard facts: General pointsIn many cases, dam projects can generate development opportunities for the affected population, which would not exist absent the projects. There is a need for both development and equity (fair sharing of benefits). There are no "innocent" technologies - all have environmental and social costs A fair comparison of options require life-cycle analysis (LCA) and accounting for environmental/social benefits and costs Hard facts: WaterDemand for water is increasing and will continue to do so, despite savings by demand-side management, particularly in emerging economies The water sector is in a crisis in many countries, partly due to lack of funds and non-market based water tariffs To improve the water supply situation, capital from the private sector is essential Governments will continue to be involved in the development of water resources projects (at different levels - regulations, public private partnerships, planning,...) Hard facts: PowerElectricity is one of the key tools for development There are 2 billion people without access to electricity Demand for electricity is increasing and will continue to do so, despite savings by demand-side management, particularly in emerging economies Emerging renewable power technologies (solar, wind) produce intermittent power, limiting their penetration to a fraction of total generation Implementation and Mitigation (Planning -> Decommissioning)Good practice (environmental and social assessment) is achieved by ensuring that environmental and social concerns are integral components throughout the life-cycle of a project. Planning - Feasibility studies
Planning - Environmental Impact Assessment
Planning - Social Impact Assessment
Licensing
Compliance
Dam Management and OperationThe Industry Group recommend: For each dam or group of dams, in consultation with local population and communities: Dam Management and Operation
Environmental and social problems inherited from the pastSolution: The Industry Group recommend that these problems be solved by dialogue and negotiation between governments, dam owners and operators, and affected parties, based on scientific studies and equity principles. Maintenance and refurbishmentOptimizing the electricity output can be undertaken by refurbishing existing hydropower plants provided that these modifications would not create unacceptable new impacts. These improvements might require a regulatory process which should be efficient, cost effective and allow the participation of the local population. The owner/operator of a dam should develop and implement a maintenance program. DecommissioningNo mandatory decommissioning should take place without a complete Feasibility Study, Environmental and Social Impact Assessments, and compensation for the affected parties. The Environmental and Social Impact Assessments should include detailed studies of impacts of alternative solutions that would provide the same amount of power or water, as appropriate. How is industry willing to improve?To take holistic approaches to projects today including a combination of technical, financial, environmental and social measures To be responsible for the mitigation of impacts caused and the compensation of impacts that cannot be mitigated Main issues for IndustryA choice of responsible contenders to ensure that all aspects of the project including environmental and social measures are undertaken The decision-making process, including the Environmental and Social Impact Assessments, should be streamlined and more predictible The decision making process must be credible, effective, efficient and transparent Solutions to past grievances must be negotiated between governments and concerned stakeholders Industry Group expectationsof civil society:All stakeholders, including NGOs, accept the result of an open multi-stakeholder process based on the WCD guidelines for water-resources projects All stakeholders, including NGOs, should adopt and follow a code of good conduct (including transparency) regarding the decision-making process for new projects Of Governments:Clear policies for involvement of the private sector in water resources development (hydropower, water supply and irrigation). Inter alia, these policies should include (assuming market-based cost of capital):
Of International Financing Institutions:Financing of options assessment and Feasibility Studies for dam projects in member borrower countries, when so requested Provide financial rewards (including extending the term of loans) for project developers complying with the WCD guidelines Improve staff capacities and skills for technical environmental and social evaluation of dam projects Use state-of-the art bidding procedures to assure all aspects of the project (including environmental and resettlement components) are implemented in accordance with specifications Next steps April - December 2000A. Rework II.1 Dams & ecosystem, V.4 Regulation, compliance & implementation B. Make reality check of WCDs recommendations prior to final approval by the Commission C. Implementation of WCD recommendation: The Industry Group firmly recommends: the ISO 14001 system to be used D. The Industry Group wants to participate in dissemination of WCD recommendations
Copyright © 1998-2001 The World Commission on Dams |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||