|
|
|
Final Paper - Table of Contents
November 2000
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1 Context of the Pak Mun dam and Mekong river basin
- 1.2 Water Resources Development Projects on Mun - Chi Basin
- 1.3 State of Aquatic Bio-diversity, Water quality and Fisheries on Mun-Chi Basin
- 1.3.1 Development of Water Resources
- 1.3.2 Hydropower Development
- 1.3.3 Deforestation
- 1.3.4 Domestic Waste Water.
- 1.3.5 Agriculture
- 1.3.6 Fisheries
- 1.3.7 Industrial Waste Water.
- 1.3.8 Saline Soils
- 1.3.9 Water Quality Standards
- 1.3.10 Aquatic Bio-diversity and Fisheries
- 1.4 The Power Sector in Thailand
- 2. The Pak Mun Project: Description
- 3. Brief History of the Pak Mun Project.
- 4.Projected Versus actual Costs, Benefits and Impact of the Pak Mun Project.
- 4.1 Cost of the Project
- 4.1.1 The Predicted and Actual Costs
- 4.2 Benefits of the Project - The Predicted and Actual Benefits: Hydropower
- 4.2.1 Projected versus Actual Mun River Runoff.
- 4.2.2 Projected versus Actual Economic Benefits of the Pak Mun Hydropower Project
- 4.3 The Predicted and Actual Benefits: Irrigation
- 4.4 Predicted and benefits – Tourism
- 4.5 Impacts of the Pak Mun Project - Aquatic Bio-diversity and Fisheries aspects
- 4.5.1 Actual Impacts on Fishing Yields
- 4.5.2 Actual Impact: Bio-diversity Aspects of Fisheries
- 4.5.3 Unpredicted Outcome: Mitigation and Compensatory Measures
- 4.6 Impact of Pak Mun Project - Social Aspects
- 4.6.1 Predicted Impacts
- 4.6.2 Actual impacts: Fresh assessment and affected people's views
- 4.6.3 Incomes
- 4.7 Resettlement: projected and actual impacts
- 4.8 Impact of Pak Mun Project - Ecological and Environmental Aspects
- 4.8.1 Key Issues
- 4.8.2 Findings
- 5. Options Assessment and Decision making process.
- 5.1 Options and Decision making in Compensation Criteria and Provisions
- 5.1.1 Compensation for Affected People during Dam Construction
- 5.2 Decision-making, Participation and Conflicts
- 5.2.1 EGAT promotional campaign and intensified tensions among villagers
- 6. Criteria and Guidelines, Policy Evolution and Compliance
- 6.1 Hydropower Aspect
- 6.2 Environment Policies on Dam and Reservoir Construction
- 6.2.1 Other Laws and Procedures
- 7.Summary Findings
- 7.1 What were the predicted versus actual benefits, costs, and impacts?
- 7.2 What were the unexpected impacts, if any?
- 7.3 Impact on Livelihood
- 7.4 What was the distribution of costs and benefits: who gained and who lost?
- 7.5 How were the decisions made?
- 7.6 Did the project comply with the criteria and guidelines of the day?
- 7.7 How would this project be viewed in today's context?
- 8. Lessons Learned.
- 9. EGAT'S Comments on June 2000 version of Pak Mum Report
- 9.1 General Comments
- 9.1.1 Standard of Documentation Format:
- 9.1.2 Use of Incredible Data
- 9.1.3 Misleading Conclusion:
- 9.1.4 Unfair Conclusion:
- 9.2 Benefits from Hydro Power
- 9.2.1 Economic Justification
- 9.2.2 Economic Justification
- 9.2.3 Financial Analysis
- 9.3 Fisheries Aspects
- 9.3.1 Methodologies and Data Used
- 9.4 Social Aspect
- 9.5 Resettlement Aspect
- 9.6 Ecological and Environmental Aspects
- 9.7 Public Health Aspect
- 10. World Bank Comments on June 2000 Version of the Pak Mun Report
- 10.1 General Comments by the World Bank
- 10.2 Bank's Views on Key Aspects of the Pak Mun Project
- 10.3 Bank's Views on the Presentation and Conclusions of the WCD Report
- 10.4 Annex I Projected and Actual Costs and Benefits of Hydropower
- 10.5 Annex II - Aquatic Bio-diversity and Fisheries
- 10.5.1 Part 1: World Bank Comments
- 10.5.2 Part 2: Response from the Fisheries Study Team to The World Bank's Comments
- 10.6 Annex III Social Aspects
- References
- Endnotes
Copyright © 1998,1999, 2000 The World Commission on Dams
|
|